Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

by **Zumeii-san** Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:22 am

We all know about the waterfall scene in part one where Naruto gets up to go pee and sees a beautiful girl twirling around in a waterfall *cough* Hinata *cough* but why is this? Why put up this particular scene? To some it might seem pointless but there must be a reason for it.

Spoiler:

by **GreatKungLao** Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:13 am

I'm sorry, but it was a filler episode, made by anime company, not by Masashi Kishimoto.

by **Zumeii-san** Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:24 am

Really!?!

Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one? 2801306734

Wow. Well, yeah then but hmm..? Is the anime company for NH because I don't know, seems like a very NH fillers to me. This filler, I liked it actually. It is a good set of fillers because it shows how much Hinata cares for Naruto, that she was able to be so determined for Naruto's happiness. They showed Hinata being determined to find the beetle in order to help Naruto locate Sasuke because she cared that much and saw how much it meant to Naruto.

by **CoolChels** Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:14 am

I enjoyed it whether it was filler or not. I would say they are fans of NH.

by **Zumeii-san** Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:06 am

^ I agree! Might be a filler but still plays into Naruhina a lot.

by **racefan1992** Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:34 pm

Most filler involves alot of NH interaction in it in Part 1. Atleast too me.

by **Fallere825** Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:10 pm

That filler arc is definitely in my top 5 (if not number 1) for fillers. We got so much from it.

Spoiler:

At the end of the day yes it was just a filler, but i still enjoyed it being the NaruHina fan i am Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one? 2835597988

Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one? 2835597988

by **Zumeii-san** Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:20 pm

Lickstermik wrote:That filler arc is definitely in my top 5 (if not number 1) for fillers. We got so much from it.

Spoiler:

At the end of the day yes it was just a filler, but i still enjoyed it being the NaruHina fan i am

Lol. Yes! It was an amusing filler. It certainly does show that Naruto is attracted to Hinata on that level whether or not he knows it is her or not. Poor Lady Hinata got so red in the face. I like the filler as a while, it showed a lot and made me think that hmm....the anime writers are pro NH ? Interesting!! I also don't believe this was the first time they added Naruhina fillers to Kishi's work. Just...curious...what's that about... Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one? 2782182229

Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one? 2782182229

by **Azuula** Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:44 pm

I don't think they have the permission to make filler episodes that kishi doesn't know about... We know it's a filler but kishi needs to approve :3

by **Aelita** Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:12 am

Because the animators who made it at the time probably liked Naruhina and thought it would end up as canon? Plus fanservice brings in the big bucks and good ratings.

I'm telling you, these different production teams seem to flip flop a lot with pairing preference. Sure there's some pro-NS fillers, but there's been tons of pro-NH fillers as well lmao. (Remember back in the day when people complained that Naruhina was mostly filler?). Bias towards different pairings might play a role, but part of me also feels like the animators are trying to give fanservice to both groups of fans.

I don't think Kishi's has had direct control over what goes on in fillers for a long time now. Isn't there an interview where he says he watches the anime once in a while to check on how they're doing with his story? Plus doesn't anyone remember the stuff put out during the infamous 'filler hell' at the end of the original Naruto series? It got hilariously bad. There was an episode where the rookie kids saved the village from sumos guys lmao. And in every episode, rasengan was the solution to friggin everything.

by **Zumeii-san** Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:16 pm

Aelita wrote:Because the animators who made it at the time probably liked Naruhina and thought it would end up as canon? Plus fanservice brings in the big bucks and good ratings.

I'm telling you, these different production teams seem to flip flop a lot with pairing preference. Sure there's some pro-NS fillers, but there's been tons of pro-NH fillers as well lmao. (Remember back in the day when people complained that Naruhina was mostly filler?). Bias towards different pairings might play a role, but part of me also feels like the animators are trying to give fanservice to both groups of fans.

I don't think Kishi's has had direct control over what goes on in fillers for a long time now. Isn't there an interview where he says he watches the anime once in a while to check on how they're doing with his story? Plus doesn't anyone remember the stuff put out during the infamous 'filler hell' at the end of the original Naruto series? It got hilariously bad. There was an episode where the rookie kids saved the village from sumos guys lmao. And in every episode, rasengan was the solution to friggin everything.

I so agree! I think it a little unfair to Kishi honestly and I know! What was up with that?! Ay, caramba! I really wish they would respect Kishi more, you know what I mean? Almost seems a little disrespectful. Now I do get what they are trying to do with paying attention to statistics within the fan base but it is a little selfish and disrespectful to me! I 'unno. Maybe they don't know what it looks like when they do that.

by **Aelita** Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:03 pm

But one can like NS and think NS is possible without disrespecting Kishimoto's work doe... no one claimed disrespect when they had Naruto blushing watching nekkid Hinata twirl around lol don't be hypocritical guys But since they've done both NH and NS filler fanservice, its safe to say you can't turn to fillers for evidence. (And because I want to believe that Kishi had nothing to do with filler hell lol)

by **Skywardstrike** Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:59 am

Because it was a NaruHina filler arc.

by **itachi75** Tue Sep 10, 2013 12:45 pm

why did we get a filler of Naruto eating hot curry? or a filler of a crying boy? or a filler of naruto scaring other students?
-
because they are pointless fillers, never mentioned again.

by **IIRUNEII** Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:21 am

Skywardstrike wrote:Because it was a NaruHina filler arc.

ya, does not count too much.

but was nice to watch none the less

by Sponsored content

Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?

Re: Funny yet interesting question: What was the point of making the waterfall scene in part one?